PARTIAL LIST OF LEGAL CLIENTS:
- DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary LLP
- Fish & Richardson
- Hogan & Hartson
- Keker & Van Nest
- Kenyon & Kenyon
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Latham & Watkins
- McKeena Long & Aldridge
- Morgan Lewis & Bockius
- Morrison & Foerster
- Nixon & Vanderhyke
- Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman
- Squire Sanders & Dampsey
- Weil Gotshal & Manges
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
- White & Case
PARTIAL LIST OF REFERENCE CASES:
Deposition interpreting in United States, Taiwan, Hong Kong & Macau:
District Court cases:
- CNCS v. Sing Pao Newspaper
- Commissarat A L'Energie Atomique v. Sharp, AU Optronics, BenQ Corp., Chi Mei Optoelectronics
- Harris Semiconductor v. Macronix International, Winbond Electronics Corp. et al
- LG Electronics v. Quanta, Compal, AsusTek, FIC et al
- LG Phillips v. Tatung, China Picture Tube, Viewsonic
- MediaTek v. Via, AOpen
- New World TMT v. Prediwave
- Resolution Performance v. Formosa Plastics Corporation, Nanya Plastics Corporation
- Samsung Electronics v. Quanta Computers, Compal Electronics, Inventec, Twinhead et al
- Sanyo v. Mediatek, AsusTek
- Semiconductor Laboratories v. Toppoly, Chi Mei Optoelectronics
- Sharp Electronics v. AU Optronics, Acer Inc. et al
- Silicon Storage Technologies v. Winbond Electronics Corp
- Via Technologies v. Intel
- Zoran v. Mediatek, AsusTek, Lite-On, Shinco, Utlima
ITC Cases:
- Genesis Microchip v. MStar, Trumpion, Media Reality Technologies (Certain display controllers)
- Integration Powers v. System General (Certain power supply controllers)
- Intel Corporation; Level One Communications, Inc. v. Altima Communications (Certain Integrated Repeaters, Switches, Transceivers)
- Lumileds v. United Epitaxy, Epistar (Certain High-Brightness Light Emitting Diodes)
- Marvall v. RealTek (Certain network controllers)
- Mediatek v. Zoran, Sunext (Certain optical disk controller chips and chipsets)
- Photobit v. Omnivision (Certain CMOS active pixel image sensors)
- Symatel v. Actions Semiconductor (Certain audio processing integrated circuits)
- UMC v. SiS (Certain Integrated Circuits, Processes For Making Same)
- Zoran v. Mediatek (Certain optical disk controller chips & chipsets)
Trial interpreting:
ITC Cases:
- Genesis Microchip v. MStar, Trumpion, Media Reality Technologies, retained by Fish & Richardson
- MediaTek v. Zoran, Sunplus, retained by DLA Piper Rudnick, Akin Gump and Weil Gostshal Manges
- Sigmatel v. Actions Computers, retained by Kirkland & Ellis, Fish & Richardson, and Finnegan Henderson Farabow
U.S. District Court, State Court & binding arbitration hearings:
- Accton Technologies v. Micro Linear Corporation
- Apple v. Tatung
- Bo Wei, Broadtran Technologies v. Great Wall Technologies
- Digital Video System v. Kuo
- Dux Capital Management v Yageo Corporation
- Retained by U.S. Attorneys for numerous criminal trials
- RT Research v. Tatung
- William Au v. Apres Technology
- Yield Dynamics v. PFD Solution
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division:
- Laserdynamics v. BenQ
- O2Micro v. Sumida
- O2Micro v. Beyond Innovation Technology Co., SI, FSP and Lien ChangElectronics
Written Translation of document production:
- Advanced Fibre Communication v. ITRI, Hitron, Vidar, Sun Moon Star, et al
- Apple Computers v. Tatung Computers
- Berg Technolgoies v. Foxconn, Hon Hai Precision Co.
- ESI v. GSI
- MediaTek v. Zoran
- Microsoft v. Google, Kai-Fu Lee et al
- PixArt Imaging v. Agilent
- Reltec v. SMS
- SEC investigation of UT StarComm
- TSMC v. SMIC
- Zoran v. Mediatek, Lite-On, Shinco, Ultima,
- Samsung v. Compal, Quanta, Twinhead et al
REFERENCES PROVIDED UPON REQUEST
|
